Dan Viets Attorney and Counselor
15 NORTH TENTH STREET COLUMBIA, MISSOURI 65201 (573) 443-6866/FAX (573) 443-1413
As most of you are probably aware, the Columbia Citizens Police Review Board has agreed to take up the appeal of our complaints regarding the Kinloch Court incident this Wednesday evening, August 11 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers in the new addition to the Daniel Boone Building.
Last week, the complainants were not allowed to speak before the commission. The Chairwoman had told me that this may or may not change at this meeting. It is likely there will be an opportunity for us to speak, but it may be after the Board has made its decision.
I know of no reason to expect that the Board will change its position. The Board voted four to three last week to accept the decision and report of the police chief. However, if the Human Rights Commission has replaced the member who recently resigned from the CPRB, that could change the outcome.
At any rate, it is my recommendation that we ask the CPRB to agree to investigate the question of whether search warrants should ever be used in the investigation of non-violent crime. The CPRB is focused on the technical question of whether the complaint against the individual police officers has been properly handled. I recommend that we ask them instead to look at the broader policy question and consider making recommendations for a change in the policy.
The execution of search warrants is an inherently potentially violent process. The execution of a search warrant involves a home invasion. Whenever a home is invaded, there is a real risk that the occupants of the home may respond with violence before they even realize that it is police officers who are invading their home. The occupants of the home invariably are truly terrorized by people battering their door open, pointing firearms at them and screaming at the top of their lungs. Frequently concussion grenades, referred to by police as “flash bangs”, are thrown near or inside of the home for the purpose of further disorienting the occupants.
There are alternative means for investigating such matters. There is almost always a claim of an anonymous or confidential informer in the application for such search warrants. That individual should be required to make a controlled buy of marijuana, either under surveillance or with recording or transmitting equipment. This is commonly done and involves far less risk to the police and the occupants of the home.
I look forward to seeing you this evening.